spiffyfitz
Apr 14, 03:14 PM
I'm getting conflicting information in this thread. I'm currently on 4.3 on my iPad, never upgraded to 4.3.1 like a lot of people here. I saved my 4.3 SHSH a long time ago.
Some users claim that 4.3.1 is not necessary to save SHSH for it, but others are telling users to hurry up and save their 4.3.1 SHSH before it's too late.
When I use TinyUmbrella, it seems to show only one version saved, 4.3. If it's not necessary to have 4.3.1 to save 4.3.1 SHSH, then how do I do it?
I am only worried that the Jailbreak is only going to work on 4.3.1 for iPad 2. I'm perfectly happy with 4.3.
EDIT!: Looks like I just needed to grab the latest update of TinyUmbrella (which probably supports 4.3.1, whereas the previous version did not.) Download it here: http://thefirmwareumbrella.blogspot.com/
Some users claim that 4.3.1 is not necessary to save SHSH for it, but others are telling users to hurry up and save their 4.3.1 SHSH before it's too late.
When I use TinyUmbrella, it seems to show only one version saved, 4.3. If it's not necessary to have 4.3.1 to save 4.3.1 SHSH, then how do I do it?
I am only worried that the Jailbreak is only going to work on 4.3.1 for iPad 2. I'm perfectly happy with 4.3.
EDIT!: Looks like I just needed to grab the latest update of TinyUmbrella (which probably supports 4.3.1, whereas the previous version did not.) Download it here: http://thefirmwareumbrella.blogspot.com/
neocell
Dec 18, 12:40 AM
I would prefer not having to ship it, thusin the Montreal area but I'll see how it goes. I'll post more info on it shortly when I actually go back to the lab. I just want someone to get some use out of it, rather than have it in a landfill somewhere.
sunsnewmac
May 2, 05:28 PM
Is there a workaround/fix that does not involve Coolbook?
calculus
Sep 13, 07:45 AM
And anyone else not seeing their iPod's playlist in iTunes after the update? The unit still shows up in devices, but I can't actually see the list of what's on it.
.
Same for me - the shuffle is there under devices but the list of tracks has gone.
.
Same for me - the shuffle is there under devices but the list of tracks has gone.
h0kie99
Aug 10, 09:18 AM
That works so well! And I see there are "options" you can add with PayPal. Great! I hope my friend goes for the "per transaction" cost thing... she might be worried about that and would feel more comfortable with a flat monthly fee, I'm not sure...
Anyone else have experience with this system?
Anyone else have experience with this system?
MonkeySee....
May 4, 11:09 AM
about:flags
oo ok i'll take a look cheers
oo ok i'll take a look cheers
Eric5h5
Mar 29, 10:03 PM
There's a bug which prevents OpenGL in the game from working in full-screen mode on Intel Macs. I think it works in windowed mode. Blizzard said they were going to fix that bug but I don't believe they have yet.
--Eric
--Eric
Don't panic
Sep 15, 07:35 PM
windows gadgets?
jiminaus
May 4, 11:55 PM
Also, when I am dragging, my cursor doesn't change to the "+" sign like with other drags in Finder or other applications, how can I do that? Thanks again.
Try adding this to your NSView subclass
- (NSDragOperation)draggingEntered:(id<NSDraggingInfo>)sender
{
Gerbera Daisy Cake #1
2 Tier Pink Gerber Daisy
Gerber Daisy Cake Decorations
Gerber Daisy Cake
I Do Blooms
gerber daisy wedding cake
Fuchsia Gerbera Daisy Cake
This is my new favorite cake!
Gerber Daisy Wedding Cake | My
0315M-Gerber Daisy
Try adding this to your NSView subclass
- (NSDragOperation)draggingEntered:(id<NSDraggingInfo>)sender
{
xfs
Mar 21, 08:07 AM
was anyone in the line today?
Photorun
Mar 12, 03:26 PM
I second your "bah" and raise you a "meh." Registershmedgister.
PaRaGoNViCtiM
Nov 28, 10:05 PM
^^Wow, thats cheap! I can't compete with that! I'll do $22 Shipped.
Yannick
Oct 12, 08:53 AM
Wow! NeoOffice loses it at line 20. Even with parentheses like this: '=(A1*6)-1'
:confused:
Try with =ROUND(A1;1)*6-1 and the problem is gone. ;)
:confused:
Try with =ROUND(A1;1)*6-1 and the problem is gone. ;)
jent
Apr 13, 01:11 PM
That's why I'm saying that they're going to soon be offering official unlocks for AT&T iPhones. They already offer them for ANY GSM phone that they sell once a subsidy contract has ended. At that point, you have paid them more than the full amount of the phone's value and you actually own the phone. They should offer an unlock for iPhones that are out of contract, just like they do for any other GSM phone they offer.
My personal take on why the iPhone is the one phone AT&T won't unlock after your contract ends is because iPhones are costly hardware with expensive data plans. In general, iPhone users pay more for the hardware and service, and presumably people with more money travel more often. And to keep things simple, a significant fraction of those customers would rather roam internationally, partly for the convenience of using their actual cell phone number, and partly for not needing to jump through any hoops. Whenever I travel, I take an unlocked flip phone and buy a local prepaid SIM card. It's super cheap, but it does get annoying to deal with new phones numbers and manual reloading of calling credit. Hence the reason why AT&T wouldn't want to unlock out-of-contract iPhones; users may travel with them and provide AT&T profit through roaming charges.
My personal take on why the iPhone is the one phone AT&T won't unlock after your contract ends is because iPhones are costly hardware with expensive data plans. In general, iPhone users pay more for the hardware and service, and presumably people with more money travel more often. And to keep things simple, a significant fraction of those customers would rather roam internationally, partly for the convenience of using their actual cell phone number, and partly for not needing to jump through any hoops. Whenever I travel, I take an unlocked flip phone and buy a local prepaid SIM card. It's super cheap, but it does get annoying to deal with new phones numbers and manual reloading of calling credit. Hence the reason why AT&T wouldn't want to unlock out-of-contract iPhones; users may travel with them and provide AT&T profit through roaming charges.
philipma1957
May 5, 05:51 PM
Why not just get a Bluray firewire external combo-drive, or superdrive? That way you can add Bluray capabilities to your mac. Just a thought.
his mac is older i don't think blu-ray can work
his mac is older i don't think blu-ray can work
andmill
Oct 24, 11:38 PM
Hey, I want to be first in line for leopard at my apple store, so im wondering when you all plan to get in line at your various stores.
itsmemuffins
Mar 8, 08:14 PM
I am number four:cool:
BKF
Aug 7, 06:10 PM
All because of those Vista 2.0 cracks?
Skilz34
Dec 8, 03:23 PM
I'm a college student and our school is offering this little guy to us at wholesale - $129. My question is, does anyone have this camera and is it worth the price? Here's the specs:
http://www.collegeholidays.com/
let me know thanks!
http://www.collegeholidays.com/
let me know thanks!
maflynn
Apr 23, 10:54 AM
She's a woman.....
https://discussions.apple.com/people/Carolyn%20Samit
http://twitter.com/#!/CSSamit
The facebook picture in google shows a woman
https://discussions.apple.com/people/Carolyn%20Samit
http://twitter.com/#!/CSSamit
The facebook picture in google shows a woman
pcypert
Mar 17, 10:18 PM
The new minis share video duties with the ram so I could see them having problems pushing graphics too hard...
Paul
Paul
logicat2001
Oct 27, 11:36 PM
Hi leikela47,
My suggestion is to visit OSX Audio (http://www.osxaudio.com). Specifically, I'd try posting a question on the Recording/Music Production forum. (http://www.osxaudio.com/forums/viewforum.php?f=12) Great group of folks and (generally) very respectful and helpful to folks with questions like yours.
For anyone who's not an audio newbie, lots of great information and discussion.
Best,
Logicat (Also, Logicat on the osxaudio forum).
My suggestion is to visit OSX Audio (http://www.osxaudio.com). Specifically, I'd try posting a question on the Recording/Music Production forum. (http://www.osxaudio.com/forums/viewforum.php?f=12) Great group of folks and (generally) very respectful and helpful to folks with questions like yours.
For anyone who's not an audio newbie, lots of great information and discussion.
Best,
Logicat (Also, Logicat on the osxaudio forum).
Lord Blackadder
Mar 9, 01:55 PM
As evidence that some rich people didn't earn their wealth, you just referenced Enron that went bankrupt, Madoff who went to prison, and the Banks who we bailed out... and would have otherwise gone bankrupt. So, essentially three examples where the free market either did or would have (without government intervention) correctly punished bad businesses. Odd choice.
Not really. I consider them vastly underpunished. Do you honestly think that all of the wealth that they stole went back where it belonged? How many friends, relatives, smaller investors and purveyors of luxury goods and services recieved a windfall from these criminals? The crime cannot be undone. They spread their ill-gotten gains around for some time and much of it cannot be recovered. Justice is only partially done at best.
Hardly. All I'm trying to do is better understand your position. You seem to take the position that the majority or mob rule can decide how much money to take from one person without inflicting the same on another person... in effect choosing winners and losers. Furthermore, you seem to not put any limit on this position so it would seem that you feel the majority has the right/ability to take as much money from 'the rich' as they choose to as long as they do it with a majority in the democratic process. This would imply that you don't think that the person who actually earned the wealth has any sort of moral or legal claim on the wealth. Please enlighten me as to where I am going astray in describing your position.
You love those loaded terms. If taxation is "mob rule", then we've been living under it since the 18th century. As far as "choosing" winners and losers, you seem fine with letting your vaunted "free market" do it; I happen to think that such a process is unjust if unalloyed with further means to prevent excess. The mere fact that a person makes a living and then some from the "free market" does not necessarily make them a legitimate "winner" with the strongest moral claim to all of their wealth. In fact, if you agree with the concept of taxation you already agree with this principle. Your "right" to anything is predicated on your ability to protect it, whether that be through legal processes, or through coercive force. Nothing in "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness" specifically states that the top 1% of this nation ought own 50% of the wealth.
You are ignoring my point about how small cabals of wealthy and powerful people pay lip service to democracy and then do whatever they want - how is this somehow less of an injustice than the rest of us raising taxes on your beloved billionaires? Especially when you aren't one of them?
Finally, just because you have a legal or moral claim to wealth or property does not mean that you are the only person with a claim, or that your claim is the strongest. All Americans have a very strong moral and legal claim to being able to earn a living - but as wealth increases the moral claim weakens, to the point that the wealthiest people maintain much of their wealth not through any moral right but simply through their own ability to hang on to it. Your first dollar is very much yours - but your ten millionth is up for some debate.
Not really. I consider them vastly underpunished. Do you honestly think that all of the wealth that they stole went back where it belonged? How many friends, relatives, smaller investors and purveyors of luxury goods and services recieved a windfall from these criminals? The crime cannot be undone. They spread their ill-gotten gains around for some time and much of it cannot be recovered. Justice is only partially done at best.
Hardly. All I'm trying to do is better understand your position. You seem to take the position that the majority or mob rule can decide how much money to take from one person without inflicting the same on another person... in effect choosing winners and losers. Furthermore, you seem to not put any limit on this position so it would seem that you feel the majority has the right/ability to take as much money from 'the rich' as they choose to as long as they do it with a majority in the democratic process. This would imply that you don't think that the person who actually earned the wealth has any sort of moral or legal claim on the wealth. Please enlighten me as to where I am going astray in describing your position.
You love those loaded terms. If taxation is "mob rule", then we've been living under it since the 18th century. As far as "choosing" winners and losers, you seem fine with letting your vaunted "free market" do it; I happen to think that such a process is unjust if unalloyed with further means to prevent excess. The mere fact that a person makes a living and then some from the "free market" does not necessarily make them a legitimate "winner" with the strongest moral claim to all of their wealth. In fact, if you agree with the concept of taxation you already agree with this principle. Your "right" to anything is predicated on your ability to protect it, whether that be through legal processes, or through coercive force. Nothing in "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness" specifically states that the top 1% of this nation ought own 50% of the wealth.
You are ignoring my point about how small cabals of wealthy and powerful people pay lip service to democracy and then do whatever they want - how is this somehow less of an injustice than the rest of us raising taxes on your beloved billionaires? Especially when you aren't one of them?
Finally, just because you have a legal or moral claim to wealth or property does not mean that you are the only person with a claim, or that your claim is the strongest. All Americans have a very strong moral and legal claim to being able to earn a living - but as wealth increases the moral claim weakens, to the point that the wealthiest people maintain much of their wealth not through any moral right but simply through their own ability to hang on to it. Your first dollar is very much yours - but your ten millionth is up for some debate.
esaleris
Mar 17, 08:42 AM
Ridiculously cool. A lot of the design elements seems very Apple-like - I hope I will be able to use these products in my lifetime.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Cf7IL_eZ38
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Cf7IL_eZ38
No comments:
Post a Comment